Showing posts with label Drugs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Drugs. Show all posts

Saturday, 1 September 2012

Act III: Enter The Addict’s Pearl


According to the Department of Health Victoria, from “2009–10, 54,024 courses of treatment (COT) were delivered to 28,508 clients in Victorian specialist alcohol and drug service”
(Department of Health Victoria, 22 May, 2012)

As a person who works in adult and youth drug detoxification and rehabilitation centres, there is a concurrent theme which runs throughout the lives of the individuals who utilise our services. These similarities are particularly evident when observing the youth who enter our doors. I have personally witnessed but one individual who did not conform to these consistent similarities, with individuals suffering from one, two or even the trifecta of issues, which are; mental health concerns, trauma, grief or loss. The one individual of many who did not conform was 15 and may have been suffering from one of these, yet failed to notify the service, but (in my humble opinion) he appeared to be at high extremes of intelligence, apparently using substances to quieten down his brain from the madness of over activity. But then again many of the geniuses of our time have been considered mentally ill at some point in their life (think John Forbes Nash Junior, centre of the acclaimed film ‘A Beautiful Mind’).


When youth come through these services, with little digging, it becomes apparent that they are aware what their issues are. This can be viewed as a positive thing, if the individual is ready to deal with these issues (which they rarely are), or negative if the individual is not emotionally or physically prepared, and are subsequently re-traumatised over and over via dreams or hallucinations. In regards to particular forms of mental illness, well, obviously that is a work in progress, and is most times still related to a capability to deal with such issues that arise from trauma or grief and loss. The best way that I can explain these scenarios is with the notion of a graph, with numbers ranging from 1-10. Each individual’s levels of tolerance are difference. One person may experience the death of a grandparent as a ‘3’ in the category of ‘grief or loss’, but then another may experience the same death as a ‘9’, and not have the appropriate emotional skills necessary to deal with such a traumatic event, resulting in such behaviour as substance use, cutting or burning themselves, or the inability to adequately function on an everyday level.


Now when you observe the adults in the detoxification centres, their issues at first seem to be drug related. They are suffering from the loss of a child to Department of Human Services, dealing with pending legals and ramifications of other sentences from incarcerations of years prior, and the loss of loved ones through overdoses, or loss of contact due to their substance use issues, or loved ones inability to be continually hurt and disappointed by the substance effected individual.  But, if we remove all of this chaos, and all of this distraction, and all of these substance subsequent sagas, what is going on for this individual? Who were they prior to all of ‘this’, prior to all of this ‘stuff’? Who were they when they were the youth, haunted daily by their original demons?


When working at the adult rehabilitation centre, these original demons progressively come to light. They say that when an individual commences substance use, they stop growing emotionally. And when they cease usage they begin growing again. So these centres hold 35 year olds, who are really 12, 13 or 15 years of age emotionally. When in these facilities, we as workers watch their walls slowly retract, the walls they have spent the last 20 years of their life building, so that they can no longer be hurt.


To some, working in these centres sound miserable, listening to sadness and misery on a regular basis. But I don’t see the sadness, I see hope. I don’t see a problem that needs “fixing”. I see people who request an open ear for them to expel their thoughts, and requests for tools to deal with these demons. But if this individual takes these tools on board is their prerogative, not mine. They are not my body, my soul, to “fix”. It is their choice when, where and how they reroute their life.

When watching these walls slowly crumble, I feel lucky that I am of the privileged few able to watch such a phenomenon. Because working in these centres is the greatest prize a person can obtain. To see a person week by week retract their walls, retract what they hide behind, and truly look at themselves, and question what is going on for them, to look their demons in the face and be no longer afraid. And thus, the demon retreats, just like the walls their owner previously hid behind. And like a pearl in an oyster, so shines an amazing person, strong, yet vulnerable; an open novel about to commence their Act III. 

Saturday, 21 April 2012

A Love Affair: Media, Ben Cousins and Ice



A Love Affair: Media, Ben Cousins and Ice

Currently Ben Cousins and his drug use are again in the media spotlight. But really, is this of any surprise? Realistically, it was just a matter of time… Again. But on a wider scale what message can be extrapolated from Ben Cousins and media representations of his drug use? When we have characters like Ben Cousins getting around, what hope does the average youth have?

The Ice Age
In response to a rise in ‘ice’ debate in May 2007, the Victorian Government Department of Human Services produced the ‘Ice: It’s a dirty drug’ campaign, targeting those aged between 15-25 years who consume the drug methamphetamine, or commonly termed ‘ice’. The minister for mental health (Ms Lisa Neville) labelled the campaign ‘youth specific media’, which exhibits youth acting out violently, picking at their skin creating scabs, and also experiencing psychotic episodes.
The Victorian Government campaign gave evidence of side effects, showing a non-glorified view of drugs, yet failed to target reasoning behind youth’s drug consumption. The campaign did not speak to youth in their language, that they can understand. The campaign was subsequently a failure, as the key targets were missed entirely.

 

The Real Face Of Ice: Ben Cousins

 Ben Cousins’ drug use initially made headlines when he was arrested in Perth due to suspected possession charges. Images of him shirtless, sporting a new tattoo, low-rise jeans, and over sized sunglasses were broadcasted throughout news media. This powerful image of Cousins was reused by the Herald Sun five months later as an exhibit of celebrity drug problems. The Herald Sun plastered shots of Cousins being paraded around by police, showing off his newly inscribed ‘Such Is Life’ tattoo; his tattoo alone attracts the attention of youth.
As a response to the barrage of media attention, youth, through their own forum, created a discussion board and praise of the football star. The online social network Facebook sports two ‘groups’ entitled ‘I Wanna Party With Ben Cousins’ and ‘Let Ben Cousins Play In Melbourne So We Can Party With Him’. Through the media’s demonisation of Ben Cousins he became a ‘hero’ to today’s youth as an icon of rebellion.
The dichotomy is however, that the news media demonise the very section of society that they should be coaxing to listen to their warnings against drug use. The media accomplish this through their use of narrative. In Cousins’ case, the picture speaks much more than the verbal content can. However, the verbal content of news media speaks to a totally different generation than does the image of Cousins.  Drug consumption is inadvertently promoted by news media, as such a significant portion of programming is dedicated to drug representations. In promoting Ben Cousins as the leader of the ‘ice’ drug subculture (attractive, famous, wealthy and gaining massive publicity), which part of this is supposed to deter youth? The manner in which the media demonise drug use is merely bait for rebellious youth. With one hand the media demonises drugs, in news media, whose audience is older and therefore the dominating force in society. On the other hand, film and television media such as Scarface, The Soprano’s and Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, Half Baked and How High, exhibit drugs as ‘the party’ and the ‘good times’ in language that speaks directly to youth. Film discourse speaks to young viewers in their language, whereas the deterrence in news media speaks to a different generation. This generation gap is replicated in the Victorian Government’s ‘Ice: It’s a dirty drug’ campaign. 

Conclusion
In contrasting images of the Victorian Government’s campaign, and the depiction of Ben Cousins, it appears that the news media’s representations of Cousins speaks more to youth about ‘ice’ and its’ effects than the acted images in the ‘ice’ campaign could ever tell. 
And after all is said and done, when will we start asking the real questions?
What is really going on with you when you need to consume drugs every day?
What lead to your drug problem?
How can we help you to be happy without drugs?